The 7 Best Joe Rogan Science Podcasts on Spotify

In the realm of podcasting, Joe Rogan stands out as a distinctive voice, known not just for his wide-ranging topics but for his unlikely journey to becoming a key figure in popularizing science. This is why we are going to look at the best Joe Rogan science podcasts today.

Rogan, an accomplished stand-up comedian, former MMA fighter, and commentator, seems an unconventional choice for delving into the complexities of scientific discourse. Yet, this very diversity makes the “Joe Rogan Experience” a unique platform in the world of podcasts.

Rogan’s transition from the high-octane world of mixed martial arts to the often reflective and contemplative sphere of podcasting is as intriguing as it is unexpected and divisive. Whether you love or hate him, you’ve got an opinion on his impact.

His primary role as a comedian and commentator has equipped him with a conversational style that is at the same time, engaging and relatable. This style, coupled with a genuine curiosity for a wide range of subjects, allows Rogan to navigate complex scientific discussions easily (if not always accurately), making them accessible to a broad audience.

The “Joe Rogan Experience” is more than just a podcast; it’s a bridge between the scientific community and the general public, demystifying science in a way few other platforms have managed. He’s not a scientist by any stretch, but there’s no denying he’s bringing real scientists some genuine exposure to audiences they otherwise might not have a chance to connect with.

In this blog post, we will explore Rogan’s influence on bringing science into the mainstream through his podcast, highlighting his engaging interviews with guests like luminary astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson and examining the wider impact of this medium on public understanding of scientific matters.

Joe Rogan’s journey to becoming a podcasting titan is as unconventional as it is impressive. Known primarily as a stand-up comedian and a color commentator for the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), Rogan’s foray into podcasting wasn’t an obvious career move. However, since its inception in 2009, the “Joe Rogan Experience” has grown exponentially, becoming one of the most downloaded podcasts globally.

Joe Rogan’s Influence on Podcasting

Rogan’s influence in the podcasting world stems from his ability to blend humor, insight, and a wide array of interests into a format that appeals to a diverse audience. His relaxed, conversational style, devoid of the formal constraints typical of traditional media, invites listeners into what feels like an intimate discussion among friends. He seems at ease (whether authentic or not) with fellow comedians and the Joe Rogan science guests alike.

This approach has not only garnered a massive following but has also reshaped the landscape of podcasting with his absolutely massive deal with spotify.

A significant aspect of Rogan’s influence is his openness to exploring a variety of topics, including science. He does so as a long-form discussion without notes that allows the guests time to breathe and the discussion to flow naturally. It’s not something you’re going to see as a B-block guest on Colbert, for example. There isn’t the time.

Unlike typical science communication platforms, Rogan’s podcast doesn’t shy away from controversial or complex subjects. He’s caught a lot of grief for this… sometimes rightly so.

Why the Joe Rogan Science Podcast Guests Bring Out the Best of the Show

This willingness to dive into the depths of scientific discussion without losing the inherent curiosity and excitement that drives science itself has made his podcast a unique and important voice in the world of science communication.

Rogan’s insane audience reach means that his discussions on scientific topics have the potential to influence public opinion and understanding significantly. Or ruin it.

But by bringing esteemed scientists and thinkers to his show, he exposes his audience to scientific ideas and debates that might otherwise remain confined to academic circles. It does seem like a good-faith effort. Not the purist, but done in relatively good faith.

So, who is that helping? Well, you dear reader, of course.

The Best Joe Rogan Podcast Episodes on Science

Let’s get to the meat of the experience. Joe has, without question, brought some pseudo-science to the table along with those who really do their absolute best to follow the scientific process. But like every experiment science conducts, if you’re drawing a conclusion before you test your hypothesis, that’s a problem.

Nobody is perfect, and the cosmos is a mysterious place generally, but this round-up is sure to evolve. Keep checking back. Sign up for our email list to get updated on our latest curation efforts.

A Recurring Theme Among Joe Rogan Science Guests

One thing you’re going to notice in the Joe Rogan Experience world is that credible guests will appear multiple times. If someone is a complete crackpot, well, sometimes there are booking issues. Science is a long game, right? The universe is 14 billion years old? We think?

It’s, then, laudable that the Joe Rogan science guests making multiple appearances are not only experts in their fields but are solid communicators of their work. As such, I’m not going to mention each and every appearance a particular guest may have made. These are just the episodes that you should listen to first to broaden your horizons as a listener.

If I didn’t pick your favorite, we may circle back. Hit us up on… ugh… X (@Discover_Pods), to let us know what you think is a better Joe Rogan science podcast episode.

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson

Neil has been appearing on Joe Rogan’s show since way back in 2013. Right around the dawn of podcasting, he’s been appearing. You can scantly have a Joe Rogan science podcast without Neil. Of course you can… keep reading, but he’s a staple in science media in general.

What makes his appearances so memorable and some of the most worthwhile shows to listen to is his innate (and practiced) ability to break down physics and the wonders of the universe in a way most everyone can understand. He makes items on massive scales, like the solar system comprehensible to the average Joe. See what I did there?

Now, granted, in addition to being an extremely gifted scientist, Neil is also a tremendous science communicator, so when he’s doing this show, he’s in his “pop” science mode, which makes these episodes all the more accessible.

One of my favorite appearances is episode #1159. The discussion starts and orbits around the intrinsic value of learning and how to become more curious generally. When the world is changing faster than ever, fostering that curiosity is more important than ever. Learning ought not to end with school.

Not only do they discuss astrophysics, cosmology, and Neil’s show Star Talk, but they bring so many other shows that can introduce science in an entertaining manner to the masses. He’s our generation’s Carl Sagan… he does host Cosmos, after all.

He’s one of the guests who draws the best out of a conversation with Rogan and creates some of the best content as a result.

Medicinal Mushrooms with Paul Stamets

Episode #1035 introduces the listeners to mycologist Paul Stamets for a wide-ranging discussion about altering consciousness and fungus’s role in practical medicine.

Now, obviously, we’re not promoting illicit drug use, but with programs like Mind Bloom making strides into the world of mental health and states like California seriously working to legalize psychedelics, this conversation is more important and relevant than maybe it has ever been.

Rogan, himself, is not shy about his use of mind-altering substances to explore his own consciousness. He’ll even walk right up to the line of recommending the experience without really crossing it. This conversation was way back in 2017. A conversation ahead of its time, the acceptability of cutting-edge science versus what society is ready to accept, can take a while.

Gallileo, Gallileo… and so forth.

This past summer, Joe had Amanda Fielding on the show to discuss psychedelics as well. While not a purely science-based episode or a classically trained scientist herself, she has worked in the field for over 50 years. In addition, her Beckley Foundation has a scientific advisory committee that is dripping with credentials.

This is a good example of a subject where Rogan has drawn some backlash. However, it makes for some great entertainment and should pique some curiosity or interest.

Joe Rogan Podcast Episode #1233 – Brian Cox

From across the pond, this episode brings us a fascinating conversation with particle physicist Brian Cox from the University of Manchester.

This conversation will blow your mind. For a couple of obvious reasons. One, contemplating the infinite is positively fascinating, and two, Cox was able to mount a global tour selling thousands of tickets per engagement to talk about cosmology. To discuss the absolutely unfathomable complexities of the universe and how what we call reality came to be. Or possibly how it came to be.

I’m not sure how many of us were around 13 billion years ago to say exactly what happened with the Big Bang, but that we can discuss it in a popular manner with expertise and rigor is encouraging.

In college, I had a professor who mentioned that sitting in on university lectures was how his mother exposed them as children to new ideas. It was their primary form of entertainment during high school for budgetary reasons, and this discussion/tour reminded me of that professor. It’s just all around, very encouraging stuff.

I don’t want to spoil the conversation for you any more than I have, but spend a couple of hours, perhaps with mushrooms, and get a larger perspective on existence.

Episode #1958 – Andrew Huberman, PhD

Andrew Huberman has been mentioned on this site before. I first heard him on the James Altucher show during the pandemic, discussing his work at Stanford and the Huberman Lab. He also has a podcast of the same name that you should check out if you enjoy this discussion with Joe.

While a trained neuroscientist, Huberman’s main focus is on improving human health using science-based approaches. It’s pretty widely known America has a problem with our collective health, so this discussion is right up a fitness buff like Rogan’s alley.

Now, these guys come from wildly different backgrounds, but everyone likes food, and they both like nutrition. It’s a good example of Rogan’s ability to skillfully interview a guest by expressing genuine curiosity.

Episode #940 – Sam Harris & Dan Harris

Two Harris’ (Harrisey?) for the price of one with this episode of JRE. Like Andrew Huberman, Sam Harris has a PhD in neuroscience and a Bachelor’s degree in philosophy from Harvard University. He’s probably more well known for his book The End of Faith, but he does take a very methodical, logical approach to his philosophical work. Not unlike a mathematician. Which can draw some ire from his critics.

Affleck, looking at you here, bud.

Say what you will about Joe Rogan science podcast episodes, but he’s given science and scientific topics a new push. But he wasn’t the bomb in Phantoms. That’s all Ben.

Dan Harris, to whom Sam is not related, is a former anchor for ABC and is now working on his project, 10% Happier. They both have podcasts and have become media figures in their own right, which is why this discussion is particularly engaging.

Sam Harris has been on the Experience a few times, but putting all three of these guys in the same room was very interesting. If you are into Joe Rogan and haven’t listened to either Sam or Dan, you will need to add their shows to your queue.

Dan’s description of a panic attack and how utterly consuming they are was of particular interest, and Sam’s take from the scientific insight was welcome.

Start with this episode, and then check out some of Sam’s other appearances on the show. If you’re interested in starting your own podcast, and you certainly should be, Joe and Sam have a discussion about how the human brain, from a neuroscience perspective, changes how you might go about monetizing said podcast.

Practical science in action there in Episode #1241.

They also discuss presidential candidates, censorship, Snowden, and all sorts of other topics that aren’t exactly science but are spurred by curiosity. So, that’s still fun.

Episode #1428 – Brian Greene

Brian Greene is a genius. Full stop. The scope of his work is to explain the universe from beginning to end and everything in between. Quantum mechanics, supernova, entropy, Stephen Hawking, universal field theory, order and chaos… it’s all on the menu.

Existential questions abound around every corner, which really put life into perspective. The finitude of life and the knowledge of that mortality is what makes us special, according to Greene. How does that small slice of time stack up in the cosmos? Especially since “we” think all complex matter will decay into nothing.

Could simulation theory help our finite minds grasp these monumentally complex concepts?

This discussion will suck you in and get the brain juices flowing.

Controversies and Criticisms

Rogan is a controversial figure. He’s divisive. No doubt about that, though I’m not sure that’s always intentional. Just about everyone in the podcast community has an opinion, and a good deal of time is that Joe Rogan sucks.

This needs to be taken with a grain of salt, though. He gets into trouble when he strays outside his perceived lane and into subject matters where he’s not a subject matter expert. But at heart, he’s an entertainer. What else would we, should we, expect?

Joe Rogan’s approach to podcasting, while widely popular and influential, has not been without its controversies, particularly in the realm of science communication. Two notable issues that have sparked debate are the reaction of some in the science community to Spotify’s support of Rogan and accusations of spreading misinformation.

Spotify’s Support: A “Slap in the Face” to Some in the Science Community

When Spotify signed an exclusive deal with the “Joe Rogan Experience,” it was seen by many as a significant win for the streaming platform. However, this move wasn’t received positively by all. Like, at all.

Some figures in the science podcasting community, such as the hosts and creators of science-focused content, viewed Spotify’s support of Rogan as a ‘slap in the face.‘ This sentiment stems from Rogan’s occasional hosting of guests who have controversial or fringe views on scientific topics.

For a platform to endorse Rogan’s podcast, which sometimes strays from the mainstream scientific consensus, felt to some like a disregard for the rigorous standards typically upheld in scientific discourse. This criticism highlights the tension between the open, exploratory nature of podcast discussions and the precision and consensus sought in scientific communication.

But Spotify is a business. A business that just dropped a tremendous amount of money on Joe Rogan’s person. Again, what should we expect from Spotify and specifically Ek? They caught a good deal of grief from the censorship lobby when they culled some of his past shows from the catalog. Should we really expect stronger methods of scientific rigor to be used by someone who is objectively not a scientist?

He talks about the existence of aliens in the same breath as a keto diet. I’m exaggerating somewhat, but these discussions are often all over the place.

Accusations that Rogan was Indulging in the Spreading of Misinformation

Joe Rogan has also faced accusations of spreading misinformation, particularly in episodes where the discussion veers into highly controversial or complex scientific topics. In some instances, his platform has given voice to perspectives that challenge or contradict established scientific consensus without sufficient counterbalance or fact-checking.

These instances have raised concerns about the responsibility of influential media figures to ensure the accuracy of the information they disseminate, especially on topics like public health or climate change where misconceptions can have real-world consequences. This was of particular interest during the pandemic when Joe Rogan flirted or outright questioned the validity of COVID-19 vaccines.

Wendy Zukerman and Blythe Terrell of the Science Vs podcast specifically called out Spotify’s content moderation rules, in an open letter, which they saw as lacking when it came to the Rogan show specifically. In protest, they went so far as to stop producing new episodes of their show on the platform unless they were created specifically to combat misinformation. Literally, they would only create new Science Vs episodes to combat misinformation.

It’s important to recognize the distinction between a platform designed for open conversation, like Rogan’s podcast, and traditional scientific communication channels. While the former provides a space for a wide range of ideas and opinions, the latter is grounded in a rigorous process of peer review and validation.

This difference can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or the spread of unverified information among the public, particularly when complex scientific matters are simplified or discussed without the necessary context.

Weighing the Balance and Seeing the Value

In conclusion, while the “Joe Rogan Experience” has played a significant role in popularizing science and making it more accessible, these controversies underscore the need for critical thinking and further inquiry among listeners. They also highlight the ongoing debate about the role of new media in science communication and the balance between open discourse and maintaining scientific integrity.

Science is the best guess, even by the experts. There’s little doubt that the guests we’ve highlighted here are some of the best in their fields who are subject matter experts. In this format, they’re talking to a curious layman who shouldn’t be seen on par.

When Joe Rogan discusses scientific subjects like vaccines without those subject matter experts and medical professionals, the audience shouldn’t be expected to take that as truth from on high. Discussing the cosmos with Louis C.K. isn’t the same as discussing cosmology with a trained astrophysicist.

See where we’re going here? Does he spread some misinformation? Sure. But, the audience bears some responsibility, when they get called out for saying something ridiculous at a party they heard on Joe Rogan, to, maybe, change their mind and consider their source. Exposure is the critical role Joe Rogan plays here, not subject matter expertise.

The Evolution and Future of Science Podcasting: Comparisons and Predictions

The landscape of science podcasting is diverse, and we think that’s a good thing. “The Joe Rogan Experience” is just one prominent example among many. In a relatively new medium, podcasting is still trying to find its footing and will go through boom and bust cycles.

In comparing Rogan’s podcast episodes that feature science-centric guests with science-focused podcasts, we can glean insights into the evolution of this medium and speculate on its future trajectory.

Comparisons with Science Podcasts

Let’s make this clear upfront. The “Joe Rogan Experience” is not a “science podcast,” per se.

Rogan’s approach to discussing science is markedly different from more traditional science podcasts. Shows like “StarTalk” hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, or “The Infinite Monkey Cage” with Brian Cox, tend to follow a more structured format, often focusing exclusively on scientific content with experts in the field. These podcasts typically aim to educate their audience on scientific concepts, using a blend of humor and rigor to make complex topics digestible.

In contrast, “The Joe Rogan Experience,” with its long-form, conversational style, offers a broader, more eclectic mix of topics, including but not limited to science. This difference in style means that while other science podcasts usually delve deeper into specific scientific issues with a higher degree of precision, Rogan’s podcast offers accessibility and a more diverse range of perspectives, albeit sometimes at the cost of scientific accuracy. Especially when left to his own devices and without a subject matter expert in the room to reign in some of the more controversial claims.

Rogan is an entertainer, albeit a genuinely curious one, but entertainers will stray outside their lane from time to time. We have to accept that as listeners.

The Future of Science Podcasting

Looking ahead, the future of science podcasting appears to be moving towards a blend of entertainment and education, a trend that Joe Rogan has been instrumental in popularizing. The amount of scientific rigor vs entertainment on any given show is going to fall somewhere on a spectrum from completely dry and accurate to completely, and outlandishly, unbelievable.

Rogan’s show skews much further towards the latter, but not so much when he has his scientific subject matter experts in the studio.

As younger audiences increasingly turn to digital media for information and entertainment, the demand for content that is both engaging and informative is likely to grow. So meeting that audience where they’re at is critical in getting the scientific rigor out there.

This evolution suggests a future where science communication is not confined to academic circles or rigid formats but is part of the broader cultural conversation. Podcasts like Rogan’s might serve as gateways, introducing new audiences to scientific ideas, and potentially leading them to seek out more in-depth or traditional scientific content.

The challenge and opportunity for future science podcasting lie in balancing entertainment value with factual accuracy and depth of content. As this medium continues to evolve, it will be crucial for content creators to navigate these dynamics responsibly, ensuring that the pursuit of broader appeal does not compromise the integrity of scientific communication.

Conclusion: Joe Rogan’s Unique Role in Popularizing Science

As we reflect on the “Joe Rogan Experience” and its place in the landscape of science communication, it’s important to reiterate that Joe Rogan is not a scientist, nor is his podcast a traditional science podcast.

However, Rogan’s value to the scientific community should not be underestimated. His podcast serves as a unique and influential platform and introduces a vast audience to scientific ideas and subject matter experts they might not otherwise encounter. The show is a tool. A lens through which science can find a broader audience. Science loves lenses!

Rogan’s strength lies in his ability to entertain, engage in open-ended discussions, and bring a wide range of perspectives to the table. This approach, while not always perfectly (or remotely depending on the guest) aligned with scientific rigor, plays a vital role in exposing listeners to new concepts and sparking curiosity.

Through his conversations with scientists, thinkers, and experts, Rogan has managed to make science more accessible and relatable to a broader audience, particularly the younger generation.

It’s true that Rogan’s methods are not flawless. As an entertainer and a facilitator of discussion rather than a scientific educator, his approach to complex topics can sometimes lead to oversimplifications or misrepresentations. However, the value of his podcast in the context of science communication is its ability to open doors – to introduce scientific ideas to those who might not seek them out independently.

In essence, the “Joe Rogan Experience” underscores a crucial aspect of contemporary science communication: the need to engage with diverse audiences in ways that resonate with them. You have to meet people where they are or they tune out.

While traditional scientific discourse remains vital, platforms like Rogan’s play a complementary role, acting as a bridge between the scientific community and the general public. Scientists doing real science shouldn’t be conflated with what “The Joe Rogan Experience” is.

While Joe Rogan’s podcast may not fit the mold of a conventional science podcast, its contribution to popularizing science cannot be overlooked. By providing a space where science can be discussed in an approachable and engaging manner, Rogan has inadvertently become a significant player in bringing science to the masses. His podcast serves as a reminder of the power of media in shaping public understanding of science and the importance of making science accessible to all.